Dementia Atlas

Impact portfolio.

Dementia ideas ranked with the same disclosed-dimension engine OnCo used for capital requests — retargeted to Need × Tractability. Missing DALYs stay Not scored. Not medical advice; not a donation ranking.

Burden context

Cite the burden. Score only what the atlas has.

Ideas below come from dementia-atlas seed. Walk bottleneck → idea → diagnosis → trial from each card.

Ranked ideas

Need × tractability on this atlas.

Composite is the geometric mean of Need and Tractability when both axes have at least one scored dimension. Unscored dimensions (including DALYs/$) are dropped, not guessed.

3 of 3
  1. Judge dementia treatments by whether households cope better, not only by a clinic memory score.

    Need100
    Tractability50
    Composite71
    How this was scored (3 of 7 dimensions)
  2. Test amyloid antibodies in the mixed, comorbid people clinics actually see, instead of only in tidy trial cohorts.

    Need44
    Tractability0
    Composite0
    How this was scored (5 of 7 dimensions)
  3. Use a blood test to decide who still needs a scan or spinal-fluid test, instead of sending everyone to PET.

    Need0
    Tractability100
    Composite0
    How this was scored (5 of 7 dimensions)

Methodology

Disclosed dimensions + expected return.

Ranking engine: same min-max normalisation and weighted axes as OnCo's startup requests, retargeted in src/lib/impact-score.ts. Philanthropic expected return (ideal DALYs × P(success) × attribution ÷ cost) is documented in docs/impact-roi-methodology.md and will populate the DALYs/$ dimension only when every factor is cited.

  • Never invent DALYs, costs, or probabilities — label gaps Not scored.
  • Every numeric claim needs a primary URL on the record.
  • Licence ≠ funding; see approvals separately.
  • No DIY experimental-treatment ROI or home protocols.

Related map: bottlenecks · ideas · Who · trials.